Every release, from foundation to enterprise runtime.
Aegisora enforces governance before execution. Each release below builds on the last: evidence, canonical authority, governance boundary, runtime hardening, platform, enterprise runtime.
v3.0.0LATESTtag v3.0.0 · 338fbce
Enterprise Governance Runtime
Aegisora v3.0 introduces the enterprise governance runtime for autonomous AI agents.
Don't just secure the model. Secure what the agent is allowed to do.
ENTERPRISE GOVERNANCE CHAIN
Agent→
Request→
Context→
Risk→
Policy→
Decision→
Enforcement→
Execution→
Evidence→
Audit
Runtime Enforcement
ALLOW / BLOCK / ESCALATE execution decisions
Enforcement at the execution boundary
BLOCK prevents provider and tool execution
ESCALATE stops execution pending approval
Enterprise Identity and Access
Workspace isolation
RBAC
Server-side authorization
Tenant boundary enforcement
Agent and Provider Governance
Agent registry and discovery
Provider and model registry
Governed model resolution
Provider and model identity integrity
Policy and Risk
Policy Studio
Policy versioning
Risk detection
Deterministic governance decision precedence
Approval Engine
Enterprise approval lifecycle
PENDING to APPROVED / REJECTED / EXPIRED
Workspace isolation
Runtime approval enforcement
Resolution synchronization
Evidence and Audit
Tamper-evident evidence ledger
Runtime evidence persistence
Enterprise audit ledger
Trace, decision, execution and evidence correlation
Tool Security
Tool security evaluation
ToolRegistry enforcement
External tool governance
MCP tool governance
Realtime Operations
Enterprise realtime events
Runtime-to-enterprise event bridge
Persistent realtime writers
Event subscriptions
Incidents, Alerts and Webhooks
Enterprise incident ledger
Governance orchestration
Alert rules
Webhook governance
Usage and Entitlements
Enterprise usage ledger
Usage metering
Persistent usage projection
Execution entitlements
Provider-level entitlement enforcement
Execution quota enforcement
Enterprise Contracts
Billing state contracts
SSO identity contracts (interface definitions; not verified with a customer IdP)
SCIM provisioning contracts (interface definitions; not verified with a customer IdP)
Enterprise recovery contracts
Security Model
Aegisora enforces governance before execution. A blocked or escalated action does not reach the provider. The runtime is designed around zero-trust execution, tenant isolation, auditable decisions and evidence-backed enforcement.
VALIDATION
Extensive enterprise and runtime regression coverage across governance decisions and execution enforcement
Approval lifecycle, evidence persistence and audit integrity
Tool security and realtime behavior
Usage and entitlements
Tenant isolation and provider execution boundaries
v2.0.0MAJORtag v2.0.0 · 08033e3
Governance Platform
The 1.x line hardened the runtime. v2.0.0 turns that hardened runtime into a broader platform for governing autonomous AI-agent execution.
FROM RUNTIME SECURITY TO GOVERNANCE PLATFORM
Identity→
Permission→
Policy→
Security→
Risk→
Decision→
Enforcement→
Authorization→
Execution→
Evidence→
Audit
Explicit Security Boundary
The decision boundary stays explicit: ALLOW, BLOCK, ESCALATE.
Platform Surface
@aegisora/audit
@aegisora/core
@aegisora/observability
@aegisora/plugins
@aegisora/policy-engine
@aegisora/runtime
@aegisora/sdk
@aegisora/security-engine
@aegisora/storage
All nine packages aligned at 2.0.0
Runtime Security
Canonical provider identity and canonical model identity
Provider/model consistency
Protected agent execution boundaries
Forged identity rejection
Governance-before-resolution ordering
Fail-closed BLOCK and ESCALATE behavior
Canonical correlation integrity
Evidence and Observability
Runtime-generated security identity preserved through governance and execution
Release artifacts regenerated from the final release tree
SHA256 evidence shipped with every artifact
VALIDATION
77/77 runtime tests passed
Build passed
Typecheck passed
Package metadata consistency passed
Release evidence integrity passed
9/9 package tarballs regenerated
9/9 SHA256 files regenerated
Release gate metadata rebound to the final commit
Final candidate worktree verified clean
WHAT CAME NEXT v3.0.0 adds the enterprise governance runtime: approvals, evidence ledger, realtime operations and entitlements.
v1.8.0tag v1.8.0 · 99da016
Runtime Hardening
The final runtime-hardening step before the governance-platform transition.
Correlation Identity Integrity
The runtime rejects attacker-controlled correlation identifiers as canonical identity. Runtime-generated identifiers remain authoritative across governance, enforcement, execution, evidence and audit.
traceId
decisionId
executionId
evidenceId
correlationId
Security Property
Request identity must remain canonical throughout the security record. Metadata may describe a request, but it cannot redefine the runtime's authoritative identity.
VALIDATION
Trace 96: Correlation Identity Integrity
77/77 runtime tests passed
Build passed
Typecheck passed
Diff integrity check passed
WHAT CAME NEXT v2.0.0 turns the hardened runtime into the Governance Platform.
v1.7.0tag v1.7.0 · 94521df
Governance Boundary
The governance boundary becomes a contract rather than an implication.
GOVERNANCE BOUNDARY
Request→
Governance→
Decision→
Enforcement→
Execution→
Evidence→
Audit
Canonical Correlation
Each governance decision remains independently identifiable.
traceId
decisionId
executionId
evidenceId
Fail-Closed Behavior
Forged runtime identities are rejected
BLOCK prevents execution and preserves the prevented / not-attempted state
ALLOW carries canonical correlation into governed execution
Audit and evidence stay tied to runtime-generated identity, not attacker-controlled metadata
Security Coverage
Governance-gated model resolution
Provider and model identity immutability
Post-governance model integrity
Provider/model consistency
Cross-provider resolution authority
Protected agent execution boundaries
Governance-boundary contract validation
WHAT CAME NEXT v1.8.0 hardens the identity itself at the governance boundary.
v1.6.0tag v1.6.0 · 3090fd5
Canonical Authority
Changes who is allowed to speak for execution.
CANONICAL AUTHORITY MODEL
Governance→
ToolRegistry→
Authorization Capability→
AgentExecutor→
RuntimeTool→
Execution
PROVIDER GOVERNANCE ORDERING
Request→
Governance→
Provider Resolution→
Model Resolution→
Provider Invocation
Single Canonical Authority
ToolRegistry became the single canonical authority for governed tool execution.
Legacy Authority Elimination
Overlapping legacy runtime authority surfaces were removed so execution could no longer be governed by competing implementations. The objective was not simply deletion, but removing ambiguity from the security authority graph.
Capability-Based Execution
Execution requires valid, scoped authorization
The runtime validates authorization existence, validity, scope and single-use consumption
Single-use authorization gives replay resistance at the execution boundary
Provider Governance Ordering
BLOCK and ESCALATE prevent downstream provider and model resolution.
WHAT CAME NEXT v1.7.0 makes the governance boundary explicit, correlated and fail-closed.
v1.5.0tag v1.5.0 · e24aee3
Evidence Integrity
Establishes the evidence contract that later governance releases depend on.
CANONICAL SECURITY RECORD
Request→
Identity→
Permission→
Policy→
Security→
Risk→
Decision→
Enforcement→
Execution→
Evidence→
Audit
Evidence as a First-Class Security Object
Canonical evidence creation at the enforcement boundary
Persistent evidence storage
Deterministic trace, decision, execution and evidence correlation
Synchronized evidence finalization
Evidence retention for blocked and prevented actions
Evidence retrieval by trace, decision and agent
Enforcement Semantics
The release formalized the difference between enforcement state and execution outcome, so you can answer both: what did governance decide, and what actually happened at the execution boundary?
WHAT CAME NEXT v1.6.0 removes competing execution authorities and establishes the canonical runtime authority model.
v0.1.4tag v0.1.4 · 02e5479
Release Hardening
Where Aegisora's engineering process started becoming measurable.
Security and Release Hardening
Stronger controls around measurable security evidence
Security Readiness CI enforcement
Package metadata validation
npm tarball and package-scope validation
Build, typecheck, runtime and example verification
Automated release validation and reproducible release controls
Supply-Chain Discipline
Release-time checks run against actual package artifacts rather than relying only on source-tree inspection. This became the basis for the evidence-driven release process of later versions.
VALIDATION
Build validation
Typecheck validation
Runtime test validation
Example smoke tests
Package metadata validation
npm package content validation
Security Readiness validation
WHAT CAME NEXT v1.5.0 turns that release discipline into runtime evidence integrity and zero-trust enforcement.
v0.1.2tag v0.1.2 · 01a74b7
Stabilization
Makes the original open-source foundation easier to maintain, evolve and integrate.
Stability Before Expansion
Focused on runtime refinement, package organization, repository maintenance, documentation improvements, developer onboarding and infrastructure stabilization. The goal was deliberately conservative: strengthen the foundation before increasing the security contract's complexity.
Developer Experience
Continued the move from an initial runtime prototype toward a structured package ecosystem and a more predictable developer workflow.
Engineering Direction
The architecture stayed centered on governed execution while the surrounding project structure matured.
WHAT CAME NEXT v0.1.4 moves from general stabilization into measurable security and release hardening.
v0.1.0FIRST RELEASEtag v0.1.0 · a494e78
Foundation
Autonomous agents should not receive unrestricted execution authority. v0.1.0 is the first public foundation for that idea.
FIRST RUNTIME BOUNDARY
Request→
Context→
Security→
Policy→
Decision→
Enforcement→
Execution→
Audit
The First Runtime Boundary
Agent actions are evaluated before reaching external tools and providers, with explicit ALLOW, BLOCK and ESCALATE outcomes.
Developer Foundations
Runtime request interception
Policy evaluation
Security analysis
Execution enforcement
Runtime observability
Audit-oriented execution tracking
LangChain / LangGraph integration
Why It Matters
The architectural starting point of Aegisora's later security and governance model: governance at the execution boundary, not after an agent has already acted.
WHAT CAME NEXT v0.1.2 refines the foundation, v0.1.4 hardens release security, and the 1.x line turns the runtime into a canonical governance architecture.